Material Profile: TPU 92A (Thermoplastic Polyurethane, Shore 92A) for FDM
FDM Engineering Material Technical Report Series
Compiled from manufacturer technical datasheets and peer-reviewed literature
Abstract—TPU 92A is a slightly softer thermoplastic polyurethane than the more common 95A grade — Shore 92A on the durometer scale. The reduced hardness comes from a higher proportion of soft polyol segments versus hard urethane segments. The result is improved rebound, softer touch, and greater flexibility, balanced against modestly more difficult printing (the filament is more prone to buckling in Bowden extruders). Suppliers include Recreus FilaFlex 92A, Polymaker PolyFlex™ TPU90, NinjaTek Edge (90A), and Filaflex Conductive (92A).
Index Terms—additive manufacturing, FDM, thermoplastic polyurethane, TPU 92A, soft elastomer.
I. MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION
This section establishes the canonical names and commercial designations under which the material is supplied.
A. Designation
Trade name: TPU 92A (generic). Examples: Recreus FilaFlex 92A, NinjaTek Edge 90A (very close in hardness), Filaflex Conductive 92A.
B. Full Chemical Name
Thermoplastic polyurethane — segmented block copolymer with ~30–35% hard urethane segments and ~60–65% soft polyol segments (lower hard fraction than 95A).
C. Aliases and Alternative Designations
|
Alias |
Origin / Usage |
|
TPU 92A |
Standard descriptor |
|
FilaFlex 92A |
Recreus grade |
|
NinjaTek Edge |
Approximately 90A, comparable performance |
|
Soft TPU |
Industry descriptor (vs 95A medium-hardness) |
II. COMPOSITION AND MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
A. Empirical Chemical Formula
Idealised: [-CO-NH-R-NH-CO-O-R'-O-]ₙ. Hard segment fraction reduced by ~5% vs 95A; soft segment fraction increased correspondingly.

Fig. 1. Repeating unit / structural schematic of the polymer matrix.

Fig. 2. Schematic of the single-phase polymer (no reinforcement).
B. Composition Breakdown
TABLE I
COMPOSITIONAL BREAKDOWN OF TPU 92A (TYPICAL / PER SUPPLIER DATASHEET)
|
Constituent |
Mass fraction |
Function |
|
Hard segment (urethane / isocyanate) |
≈ 30 – 35 wt% |
Reduced versus 95A → softer grade |
|
Soft segment (polyether / polyester polyol) |
≈ 60 – 65 wt% |
Higher fraction → more flexibility, higher rebound |
|
Stabilisers, antioxidants, processing aids |
< 2 wt% |
UV / thermal protection |
|
Total |
100 wt% |
— |
III. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES — XZ PRINT DIRECTION
In the XZ orientation the tensile load is applied parallel to the deposited rasters; for fibre-reinforced grades this is the strongest orientation because the fibres align preferentially along the extrusion direction.
TABLE II
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES — XZ ORIENTATION (TPU 92A)
|
Property |
Value (XZ) |
Test method / source |
|
Tensile strength, ultimate |
≈ 35 – 45 MPa |
ASTM D638 |
|
Tensile strength, yield |
Not applicable (elastomer) |
Elastomers do not exhibit conventional yield |
|
Elastic limit |
~ 5 % strain (estimate) |
Engineering estimate |
|
Young's modulus |
≈ 15 – 22 MPa |
ASTM D638 (lower than 95A) |
|
Elongation at break |
Up to ~ 900 % |
ASTM D638 |
|
Izod impact, notched (23 °C) |
No break (elastomer) |
ASTM D256 |
IV. MECHANICAL PROPERTIES — ZX PRINT DIRECTION
In the ZX orientation the tensile load is applied perpendicular to the print layers, so failure occurs through inter-layer (Z) bonds. Properties are markedly lower than in XZ — this anisotropy is intrinsic to FDM.
TABLE III
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES — ZX ORIENTATION (TPU 92A)
|
Property |
Value (ZX) |
Test method / source |
|
Tensile strength, ultimate |
≈ 22 – 28 MPa (estimate) |
Engineering estimate |
|
Tensile strength, yield |
Not applicable |
Elastomer |
|
Elastic limit |
~ 4 % strain (estimate) |
Engineering estimate |
|
Young's modulus |
≈ 14 – 20 MPa (estimate) |
Engineering estimate |
|
Elongation at break |
≈ 350 – 500 % (estimate) |
Engineering estimate; layer adhesion governs |
|
Izod impact, notched (23 °C) |
No break (estimate) |
Engineering estimate |
Like 95A, anisotropy primarily affects elongation rather than modulus or hardness. The lower hard-segment fraction makes inter-layer welding marginally more sensitive to print parameters.
V. RECOMMENDED PRINT PARAMETERS
Values summarised below give consensus operating windows from public datasheets. Specific suppliers may differ within ±10 °C; the supplier datasheet always supersedes this table.
TABLE IV
RECOMMENDED PRINT TEMPERATURE RANGES FOR TPU 92A
|
Parameter |
Range |
Notes |
|
Nozzle temperature |
220 – 240 °C |
Slightly higher than 95A to ensure complete melt of soft segments |
|
Build plate temperature |
30 – 60 °C |
PEI / glass with adhesive |
|
Chamber temperature |
Ambient |
Not required |
|
Print speed |
15 – 25 mm/s |
Slower than 95A; direct-drive strongly recommended |
|
Pre-print drying |
50 °C × 4 – 6 h |
Mandatory; even more hygroscopic than 95A |
VI. GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE (TG)
Reported / typical Tg: ≈ -35 °C (soft segment); hard segment Tg ≈ 70 – 90 °C.
Soft segment Tg is slightly lower than 95A (more polyol content), giving better low-temperature flexibility (down to -40 °C). Upper service limit is correspondingly slightly lower (~70–80 °C) due to reduced hard-segment fraction.
VII. HEAT DEFLECTION TEMPERATURE (HDT)
Heat deflection temperature is the temperature at which a standard bar deflects 0.25 mm under a specified flexural load (ASTM D648 / ISO 75).
TABLE V
HEAT DEFLECTION TEMPERATURE OF TPU 92A UNDER STANDARD TEST LOADS
|
Test load |
HDT |
Standard / source |
|
0.45 MPa |
Not typically reported (elastomer) |
ASTM D648 — generally inapplicable to elastomers |
|
1.82 MPa |
Not typically reported |
ASTM D648 — generally inapplicable |
VIII. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS AND STANDARDS
A. Softer, higher rebound than 95A
The 3-point lower Shore A hardness translates to substantially higher elastic rebound and a more 'rubbery' tactile feel. Specifically suited to applications where a 95A part feels too hard or where higher cushioning is required.
B. Conductive variants available (e.g., FilaFlex Conductive 92A)
Recreus offers a conductive 92A variant where the polymer is loaded with conductive carbon black to enable wearable electronic and sensor applications. Volume resistivity ~10² Ω·cm in the conductive grade.
C. Print difficulty trade-off
The increased flexibility comes at the cost of harder printing — the filament buckles more easily in Bowden tubes and requires a direct-drive extruder for reliable feeding. Print speeds typically 5–10 mm/s slower than 95A.
D. Chemical and abrasion resistance
Similar to 95A: resistant to oils, greases, fuels, alcohols. Slightly more sensitive to high-temperature chemicals due to reduced crystallinity in the hard segment.
IX. REPRESENTATIVE APPLICATIONS
TPU 92A is typically deployed in the following applications:
1) Soft-touch consumer product surfaces: Phone case grips, electronic device covers, ergonomic handles.
2) Wearable / conductive sensor components: FilaFlex Conductive 92A — flexible electrode and EMG sensor pads.
3) Higher-rebound vibration damping: Anti-vibration mounts where 95A is too stiff for the application frequency band.
4) Custom-fit insoles and orthotics: Greater conformability than 95A; closer to traditional shoe-insole rubber durometer.

(Source : Unionfab)
5) Soft sealing surfaces and bellows: Where 95A is too rigid to deflect under low-pressure differentials.
Photographs of representative parts in these applications are not reproduced here for copyright reasons; the table below provides direct manufacturer / case-study URLs where original imagery and project descriptions can be viewed.
TABLE VI
SUGGESTED IMAGE / CASE-STUDY SOURCES
|
Application area |
Source URL |
|
TPU 92A wearable / electronic device cover |
https://recreus.com/en/12-filaflex |
|
TPU 92A custom orthotic / insole |
https://www.ninjatek.com/products/ninjatek-edge/ |
X. REFERENCES
[1] Recreus, “FilaFlex 92A Material Data Sheet,” 2024. Available: https://recreus.com/en/12-filaflex
[2] Recreus, “Filaflex Conductive 92A Datasheet,” 2024.
[3] NinjaTek, “Edge TPU Datasheet (90A),” 2024. Available: https://www.ninjatek.com/products/ninjatek-edge/
[4] Polymaker, “PolyFlex™ TPU90 Material Data Sheet,” 2024.
[5] ASTM D638-14, ASTM International, 2014.
[6] ASTM D2240, “Standard Test Method for Rubber Property — Durometer Hardness,” ASTM.
[7] ISO 7619-1, “Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic — Determination of indentation hardness — Shore hardness,” ISO.